SET Announcements
19 April 2007
4) Opinion of Independent Financial Advisor Concerning
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity
121.23 75.58 69.53
Total revenues 152.35 96.96 127.02
Total expenses 115.14 63.65 69.75
Net profit (loss) 24.86 24.02 57.27
Net profit (loss) per share (Baht) 49.72 48.03 114.54
Book value per share (Baht) 160.99 128.03 110.95
Notes : Par value at Baht 100 per share
3.10 Shareholdings
The shareholders of BJT as at 26th January 2007 are as follows:
Name No. of shares % of holding
1. Pathum Thani Water Co., Ltd. 499,994 99.99
2. Miss Phonthipha Chirawichit 1 0.00
3. Miss Tongthip Hannapha 1 0.00
4. Miss Orawan Ruchithet 1 0.00
5. Miss Alisa Prasertdecho 1 0.00
6. Miss Warisra Chaimongkhon 1 0.00
7. Mr. Thawatchai Limwong 1 0.00
Total 500,000 100.00
3.11 The Board of Directors
The Board of Directors of BJT as at 2nd February 2007 is as follows:
Name Position
1. Mr. Vorawut Anurakvongsri Director
4. Reasonableness of the transactions
4.1 Objectives of the entering into transactions and the necessity to
enter into transactions
According to the Board of Director' Meeting No. 6/2006 which held on 25th
December 2006, resolved to grant approval for the Company to sell
143,062,000 ordinary shares in TTW to the general public at the price equal
to TTW's public offering price (CK invested in TTW by holding 1,549,839,400
ordinary shares, representing 47.69 percent of TTW's paid-up capital of
Baht 3,250 million. In this regard, TTW will issue its ordinary shares for
public offering by allowing its existing shareholders to jointly offer
their ordinary shares for sale in proportion to the shareholding ratio
concurrently with TTW's public offering of newly issued ordinary shares, so
as to ensure that TTW is qualified in accordance with the rules of the SET,
namely, having its share distribution of minority shareholders in aggregate
not less than 25 percent of its paid-up capital.
It is stated in the Filing Form filed by TTW to the SEC that according to
TTW Board of Directors meeting No. 2/2006 on 18th August 2006, TTW has a
policy to take over PTW as its subsidiary within five years and has
included this project in its one-year plan. The objective of this is to
mitigate the conflict of interest that may arise from the competition
between TTW and PTW, which are related companies as they have the same
major shareholder, i.e. CH. Karnchang Plc.
4.2 Comparison of the advantage and disadvantage of the entering and
non-entering into transactions that may affect the Company in various
aspects
Advantage
1. The transaction will enable a shareholding restructure in the tap water
business of the CK group and will help eradicate the conflict of interest
potentially incidental to the competition between TTW and PTW.
2. After the merger of TTW, which is the private tap water producer and
distributor with the largest capacity in the country, with PTW, which is
the second biggest producer after TTW, the production capacity of the
merged company will tremendously outstrip those of its competitors.
Moreover, after listing on the SET, the merged company will have a high
market capitalization, hence a magnet for local and foreign institutional
investors.
3. The merger between TTW and PTW will create economies of scale through a
sharing of certain resources and/or saving of some double expenses. For
instance, the company can procure chemical substance in a bigger lot that
will give it a bargaining power for a greater price discount, or they may
share the human resource unit.
4. In any future bidding for a tap water concession project, CK can
designate only one between TTW and PTW to join the bid and will no longer
face the public agency's skepticism about the two companies having the same
major shareholder which can possibly lead to bid collusion.
Disadvantage
1. Both TTW and PTW may be closely watched by the concerned public agency
or state enterprise if they join in the same bid competition for any future
tap water concession project, hence a possible loss of business
opportunity.
2. TTW's recapitalization plan to accommodate the capacity expansion to
serve the growing tap water demand may have to be delayed until after the
completion of PTW's capital decrease and the corporate restructure of TTW
after having PTW as its subsidiary.
4.3 Comparison of the advantage and disadvantage between the entering
into transaction with connected person and the entering into transaction
with third person.
Advantage
The fact that CK, PTW and TTW have common directors and shareholders and
the executives of the three companies have had a good relationship helps to
facilitate the transaction price negotiation. On the contrary, to conduct
the transaction with an outsider may take longer time and incur additional
expenses on due diligence review in terms of financial status, legal status
and asset quality.
Disadvantage
To make the transaction with a connected party may generally give
rise to a conflict of interest such as the power of negotiations, prices
and other conditions, unless the price and condition are the same as those
of normal trade done with an outsider or persons without a vested interest
are involved in the transaction.
The reasons why the Company does not enter into a transaction with
third person
The purchasing of PTW ordinary shares is for restructuring and to
reduce a conflict of interest which may occur in the future prior an
Initial Public Offering and Listing of TTW. Moreover, Tap water production
and distribution is a large basic infrastructure business that requires
huge capital, proper technology and the operator's proven track records.
Based on the Department of Water Resource's information, there are a total
of 81 local private operators of tap water business and only a few of them
are large operators with a capacity of more than 15,000 cubic meters per
day and number of users of more than 8,000. Meanwhile, all other operators
have a much lower capacity than both PTW and TTW. As a consequence, to make
the transaction with an outsider is not easy and will not generate the
optimal benefit to the business and the shareholders.
Further, to do the transaction with an outsider, the Company may have to
acquire the information about the assets and liabilities by itself and may
thus encounter a constraint on access to the information. It may
accordingly have no in-depth information available before proceeding with
the negotiation and may take some time to study the information and also
bear extra expenses.
5. Fairness of price and conditions of the transactions
After reviewing the information and documents obtained from the Company
and other relevant information. The Financial Advisor's opinion is as
follows:
5.1 Reasonableness and appropriateness of the indicative selling price
We compared the indicative selling price with prices calculated by
various valuation approaches and also reviewed market comparables. The
results of our review are as follows
5.1.1 Book Value Per Share Approach
This approach considered the Company's book value from its financial
statements at a particular point of time, but it did not consider the value
of the firm from its future operating performance or the impact from
economic conditions and industry trends.
Using the internal financial statements of PTW as at 31st December
2006 which were
unaudited by the auditor, the following are details of this method:
Shareholders' equity as at 31st December 2006 (482.73) Baht millions
No. of shares on issue 11.02 Million
shares
Book value per share (Baht) (43.80) per share
Based on this approach, the book value is negative Baht 43.80 per
share.
We do not, however, believe this method is a reasonable guide to the
true value of the Company as it does not reflect the ongoing earnings of
the business.
5.1.2 Adjusted Book Value Per Share Approach
This approach considers the Company's adjusted book value after
adjustments regarding changes in shareholders' equity including major
events which occurred after the date has been specified in the financial
statements such as the value of its assets based on independent assessments
and the effect this has on shareholders' equity. This approach did not
consider the value of the Company from its future operating performance and
the impact from economic conditions or industry trends.
As at 25th January 2007, the Company's registered and paid-up capital
were Baht 2,752 million divided into 27.52 million ordinary shares (par
value at Baht 100 per share). Subsequently, on 26th January 2007 the Board
of Directors Meeting passed a resolution to decrease its registered capital
by Baht 1,552.00 million from Baht 2,752.00 million by way of decrease of
15.52 million shares, thereby remaining the registered capital of Baht
1,200.00 million divided into 12.00 million ordinary shares. Such capital
reduction was to decrease the number of shares according to its
shareholding ratio in PTW as well as to reduce the accumulated loss. On 6th
February 2007, the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of the
Company resolved to approve such registered capital decrease which is
currently in process. It is expected to complete the decrease of the
registered capital in June 2007.
Adjusted value
From the said events which were the events occurred after 31st
December 2006 and also effect to the Shareholders' equity significantly.
The adjusted book value per share after adjustments in shareholders' equity
of PTW as at 28th February 2007 is as follows:
(Unit : Baht)
Internal account as at 28th February 2007
Registered and paid-up capital 2,752,000,000.00
Accumulated loss (1,912,411,622.30)
Shareholders' equity 839,588,377.70
Adjustments considered appropriate:
Less : Capital reduction and reduce accumulated loss (1,552,000,000.00)
Financial statements after capital reductionRegistered and paid-up capital
1,200,000,000.00
Accumulated loss (360,411,622.30)
Shareholders' equity 839,588,377.70
Book value per share 69.97
Notes : Par value at Baht 100 per share
Based on this approach, the adjusted book value is Baht 69.97 per
share, or 78.92 per cent lower than the indicative selling price.
5.1.3 Price to Earning Ratio Approach, PER
This approach evaluates the share price by multiplying the Company's
earnings per share ("EPS") calculated from the financial projections at the
end of 2007 with the price to earnings (P/E) ratio of Eastern Water
Resources and Development Plc. ("EASTW") during different periods between
30 and 180 business days prior to 29th March 2007. All quarterly results
and quarterly historical earnings in EASTW provide an acceptable base of
comparison.
Comparison with Eastern Water Resources and Development Plc.
Calculation Time Interval Average PER Ratio of EASTW Resultant Price
Period Max. Min. Average (Baht)
30 business days 15 Feb. 07 -
29 Mar. 07 13.66 13.13 13.40 81.44
60 business days 4 Jan. 07 -
29 Mar. 07 14.09 13.13 13.61 82.75
90 business days 17 Nov. 06 -
29 Mar. 07 14.86 13.13 14.00 85.09
120 business days 5 Oct. 06 -
29 Mar. 07 14.86 13.13 14.00 85.09
180 business days 10 Jul. 06 -
29 Mar. 07 14.86 12.88 13.87 84.33
Source : SET SMART
We use EPS for the estimated four preceding consecutive quarters from
1st January to 31st December 2007, which was Baht 6.08 per share. Based on
this approach, the Company's share price is between Baht 81.44 and 85.09
per share, or from 74.37 per cent to 75.47 per cent lower than the
indicative selling price. However, we do not consider the Price to Earnings
Ratio of companies in EASTW to be an appropriate approach to determine the
market price of the Company's shares, as the business operations of EASTW
differ from those of PTW. By comparing between PTW and EASTW, a water
supplier to industrial estates in the eastern region, it is usually
misunderstood that the two companies have engaged in a similar business. In
fact, EASTW operates a raw water business by transmitting raw water
obtainable from the Royal Irrigation Department to industrial factories in
the eastern region. PTW itself produces boiled water or tap water
undergoing both chemical treatment (sedimentation process with addition of
chemical substance) and physical treatment (filtration process) and then
transmits the treated water directly to PWA.
5.1.4 Price to Book Value Ratio Approach, P/BV
This approach evaluates the share price by multiplying the book value
per share calculated from the most recent financial statements with the
average price to book value (P/BV) ratio of EASTW between 30 and 180
business days prior to 29th March 2007. We used PTW's adjusted book value
per share as at 28th February 2007, which was Baht 69.97 per share.
Comparison with Eastern Water Resources and Development Plc.
Calculation Time Interval Average P/BV Ratio of EASTW Resultant
Price
Period Max. Min. Average (Baht)
30 business days 15 Feb. 07 -
29 Mar. 07 1.58 1.48 1.53 107.05
60 business days 4 Jan. 07 -
29 Mar. 07 1.64 1.48 1.56 109.15
90 business days 17 Nov. 06 -
29 Mar. 07 1.79 1.48 1.64 114.40
120 business days 5 Oct. 06 -
29 Mar. 07 1.79 1.48 1.64 114.40
180 business days 10 Jul. 06 -
29 Mar. 07 1.79 1.48 1.64 114.40
Source : SET SMART
Based on this approach, the Company's share price is between Baht
107.05 and 114.40 per share, or from 65.54 per cent to 67.75 per cent lower
than the indicative selling price. We do not consider the Price to Book
Value Ratio approach to be an appropriate approach to determine the fair
value of an operating Company's shares as the business operations of EASTW
differ from those of PTW.
5.1.5 Discounted Cash Flow
The Discounted Cash Flow ("DCF") approach is an appropriate
methodology when:
1) Accounting for specific assumptions regarding the nature and
timing of future economic benefits arising from activities of a business
and;
2) When the nature of the valuation project regards the business
as a going concern for which the underlying drivers of profitability can be
predicted within a reasonable degree of certainty.
The purpose of this valuation is to present the present value of the
Company assuming that the Company is operated under the same management
and business policies as in the past. As a result, our assumptions are
based without taking into account the acquirer's new business policies.
The principal methodology adopted by Financial Advisor in regard to
the Company's DCF model is detailed below:
1) The Company's consolidated future free cash flows are forecast
explicitly from 1st January 2007 to 14th October 2023;
2) There is no calculation of Terminal Value of the Company. Due
to the Company shall transfer the ownership over the assets it has invested
in to the government at the end of concession period.
Discount Rate
To discount the Company's projected free cash flows, we applied the
Capital Asset Pricing Model ("CAPM"). The CAPM is a widely held method of
determining the appropriate risk adjusted rate of return ("the cost of
equity" or "Ke"), as required by well-diversified equity investors.
Therefore, the discount rate calculated based on CAPM, is as
follows:
Ke = Rf + ? (Rm - Rf)
Rf : Risk free rate was based on the yield to maturity of
Thai Government Bonds maturing in 17 years on 29th March 2007, equivalent
to 4.59% p.a. (based on The Thai Bond Market Association).
Rm : Expected return on the Market Portfolio, equivalent to
13.07% (data from Bloomberg as at 29th March 2007).
? : Beta coefficient is the variable used to measure the
systematic risk of the EASTW's stock (similar business to PTW) based on its
trading against the exchange index for a certain period, equivalent to
0.5260.
Based on the above, we have calculated the cost of equity, as
follows:
Ke: 4.59 + 0.5260 x (13.07 - 4.59) = 9.05%
Since PTW is not listed on the SET, we have adjusted the Ke upward by
20 per cent to absorb such non-listing risk, leading the Ke to be revised
to 10.86 per cent. The share price of PTW valuated based on the above data
and the assumptions below will be as follows:
The key assumptions in our PTW's valuation are as follows:
1. PTW's customers
PTW engages in the production and distribution of tap water in Pathum Thani
- Rangsit areas under concession from PWA, which is PTW's sole customer.
2. Revenues from sales of tap water
We have estimated the tap water fee, based on the inflation rate
(assuming the inflation rate will remain constant at 3% per year between
2008 and 2023 which is the end of the concession period). Average tap water
fee is set at Baht 9.6204/cu.m. (this is the actual rate prevailing in 2006
which is used as the base year). Under the tap water supply contract signed
with PWA, the tap water fee for 2006 is Baht 9.90/cu.m. (the rate is as
expressed in the invoice, exclusive of VAT, for tap water supplied after
discount).
For year 2007, the fee will be Baht 10.34/cu.m. on average (based on
the actual data during January-February 2007). Such rate was first adjusted
on 1st January 2007 by the calculation formula specified in the contract
signed with PWA on 15th September 2006.
The average production output from 2006 to the end of the concession
period in 2023 will be as follows:
- 2006 = 0.294 million cu.m. / day (based on actual)
- 2007 = 0.330 million cu.m. / day
- 2008 = 0.345 million cu.m. / day
- 2009 = 0.358 million cu.m. / day (from 2009 onwards the projected
average output will equal to the minimum off-take quantity of 0.358 million
cu.m. / day). The minimum availability rate throughout the concession
period not exceeding 0.288 cu.m. / day. On 15th September 2006, it signed
another contract with PWA for an additional supply of 70,000 cu.m./day of
tap water.
3. Cost of tap water sales
In 2006, PTW will still bear the management fee under the O&M
agreement made with OPCO on April 23, 1999 at an average of Bt. 2.82/ cubic
meters (this is an actual figure prevailing in 2006 which is the base
year). PTW will also have to absorb the cost of service incurred by OPCO.
In 2007, it will no longer have to bear this cost, following the payment of
the O&M agreement cancellation fee to OPCO on January 26, 2007.
In 2007, PTW has managerial costs including salary, security,
chemical, energy, disposal of sludge, water quality taste and other
expenses. PTW will bear the management fee at Bt. 2.40/cu.m. (based on the
actual figure prevailing in January and February 2007 and O&M Agreement
between PTW and BJT which signed on 26th January 2007) under our assumption
that the inflation rate will remain constant at 3% per year between 2008
and 2023.
The main cost of tap water sales is R&M. Other costs include
maintenance of machinery and equipment and miscellaneous expenses, which
(more)